2-5-2017
Forum Response To: Tivol Lewis
From: Miss. Bayo Elizabeth Cary, AA, BA, MLIS
Re: “How is mental health, related to: domestic and
International terrorism?”
Due to my interest in the
deradicalization process the collaborative social approach really piqued my
interest. This approach stresses there is a "need" for change
or resolve. I was wondering change or resolve in regards to what types of
situations? Would a need for mental change be applicable to this approach, why
or why not?
–Tivol Lewis
Democrats, in the United States, tend to be terrorists
now, because of the Obama Administration. Mr. Obama invited immigrants, to the
US, from all over the world-who, hate Americans, and people with White skin.
The new
immigrants, to America, joined the Democratic political party, because: Obama
ran for US President, as a Democrat. A political ideology-is not normally, a
mental illness, unless, the political beliefs, are too dangerous, to the
remainder of society, and or-the world. Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights
(1995-2017) http://www.cchr.org/-an
International Organization, has a museum-as a protest, against mental health
torture, in the US: “Psychiatry, An Industry of Death!”
Democrats,
right now, are at Capitol Hill, in Washington, DC, and they are arguing, about
the mental health, of President Donald Trump. Democrats, in Washington, DC-disagree,
with the Trump political policies, which are based, on Republican values.
Nothing, that I am aware of, that Mr. Trump, has signed as law-indicates any
mental illness. The fact that, Donald Trump-believes, as a Republican, that he
can make America safer, by halting immigration, to America, is not a mental
health problem.
It is
illegal in the US, to use political ideology against people, and, to pretend
like a person is mentally ill, because, you disagree, with their political
beliefs and values. Giving, the process, of sending people to a mental
hospital, for refusing to support International terrorism-a name: “deradicalization
process/mental change process,” does not make torture, at mental hospitals in
America-legal. The act of torture, is illegal-internationally, through the
International court systems.
Although-radical
and aggressive means, are legally utilized, in Africa, and other parts of the
world, to change an individual’s political beliefs-a lobotomy, because you
refuse to change over to the Democratic party-is not legal in the US, and
supporting those ideals, is-prosecutable, and, to-the-fullest-extent of the
law: “TERRORISM!” A lobotomy, is not a legal torture tactic, that can be
utilized, in an International war situation-either.
What
are the Geneva Conventions (Beehner 2006, “Geneva”)? The Geneva Convention of
1951, drew up an international agreement, of: rules, and laws, and
international regulations-which, supposed to protect victims, during a time of
crisis and war. “The Geneva
Conventions provide an agreed-upon framework of legal protections to safeguard
soldiers, civilians, and prisoners during wartime (Beehner 2006, “Geneva”).”
It
is a serious problem for America, that Donald Trump wants to re-implement: torture
and abuse, at: Gitmo in Cuba. Article three of the Geneva Conventions: “This article of the Geneva Conventions bars torture,
cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment, as well as outrages against the human
dignity of prisoners of war, or POWs (Beehner 2006, “Geneva”).”
I support the Trump Administration-to, a
limited extent. I will never support torture, or abuse, of: citizens, MIA, US
Military, or anyone else. It is more than just “bad face,” to support those
types, of radical responses, to an international disagreement. “Since September 11, 2001, the U.S. treatment of suspected
terrorist detainees—both abroad and at Guantanamo Bay—has come under criticism
from human rights groups and legal scholars (Beehner 2006, “Geneva”).” America,
is not immune, from the deliberations, and penalties, of the International
court system.
Questions, about the legality, of the US,
supporting torture, has been discussed at length-in the International court
system (Beehner 2006, “Geneva”):
In the case of the Geneva Conventions, ‘internationally this is settled
black-letter law,’ Crane says. The issue, he says, focuses on a U.S. domestic
debate to prevent foreign detainees from suing CIA officers for war crimes in
U.S. domestic courts. (Beehner 2006, “Geneva”)
I have been tortured
in the US, and, I received no response, from the US government, or court
system. I am suing in International court-where, I have already won my case!
If we cannot discuss the problems, with
respect, for each other-like to human beings, then, we need to take the concern
to court. When, the American court system fails-then, the problems need to be
heard in a higher court: International Human Rights Court. I, for one, am
collecting evidence. I have begun my application, to law school. I am Tweeting
to International Intelligence officers. I am looking for witnesses, that will
not have to be subpoenaed-first.
References
Beehner, Lionel. 2006. “The United States and the Geneva
Conventions.” Council on Foreign
Relations. Accessed February 5 2017. http://www.cfr.org/international-law/united-states-geneva-conventions/p11485
Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights.
1995-2017.
“Watch Dog &
Exposing Psychiatric Human Rights Abuses.” Citizens
Commission on Human Rights Online Website. Accessed February 5, 2017. http://www.cchr.org/
No comments:
Post a Comment