2-19-2017
APUS American Public University System
2nd Master’s Degree Intelligence Officer In
Training
Intelligence and Global Security Studies
Miss. Bayo Elizabeth Cary, AA, BA, MLIS
Email: mumbaibayo.cary@yandex.com
Cell: 1-352-642-6541
Re: “How is recording the
original meaning of information and intelligence collected, and the source that
supplies the information, directly related, to the quality, of the information?”
In the reading this week
it said that coding in qualitative research is a constant state of revision and
fluidity (Bryman, 2012). –Amy Cornell-Titcomb
The idea of constantly
recoding, your collected information, is incorrect. When intelligence is
collected, it is within a certain context. The meaning derived from the
intelligence, at-the-moment it is collected, is the correct association, for
the information. Re-writing, your interpretation, of what you collected, over
and over again-weeks, even months later, takes away from the truth revealed, by
the initial encounter. Re-writing history, by changing your opinion every
season, with the Paris fashions, is a serious: “faux paus.” Keep your
evaluations, of your intelligence/information, fresh, and honest-a first
impression.
Popular opinion states, that the record of
history, is in the hands of the powerful, and the ruling classes. It is
hypothesized, that various governments, and political regimes, continually
re-write history, to place their: culture, race, ideology, and successes-at the
very top of achievements. I would propose, that the problem, is to such an
extreme, that: pictures are re-painted, statues are re-carved, and money, is
re-printed-not just the reprinting of the Bible. It would be unfair to state,
that, only the French, are ethnocentric-with their exclusive and “clique,”
social structures.
The social participation, in
decision making, and the inclusion of disparate groups, can be gaged, with a
prior evaluation. Individuals operate, within a certain: social network, and,
the network, is generally a fixed, and reinforced association, of continuous,
and repeat interactions: cohorts, employment environments, educational
institutions, churches, etc. A sampling, such as a: “group study,” can be
applied, as an initial evaluation, to begin a determination, of the functional
level, of the: friends and family. People tend to aggregate, around
commonalities, i.e. : “Birds of a feather flock together.” The “closest linkages,”
friends/family-one should find, that they share similar: genes, IQ,
preferences, behaviors, habits, morals, ethics, etc.:
Specifically, a March
2015 Army review showed that most pilots in certain Army units did not complete
fundamental training tasks in fiscal year 2014—a finding that GAO corroborated
through discussions with pilots in focus groups and unit responses to
questionnaires. (“GAO” 2015, 1)
There are some, who would
argue, that to have a society, and to have a ruling ideology-all that is
required, is a majority rule. It was Socrates, who wrote, that there are some,
who must necessarily be excluded, from the decisions, of a ruling class.
Socrates argued, that “retarded people,” while they may be functional enough,
to feed themselves, and to walk home, from a long day of work-are not of the
mind-set, to be, the entrusted representatives, with the responsibilities and
obligations-which fall incumbent, upon a county’s leadership. Socrates pointed
to the fact, that, while money, can buy nice clothing-it cannot purchase common
sense.
Then, retarded people, over-re-produced (and
had too many babies), developed a majority in Greece, and, Socrates was
killed-for being brilliant. Socrates, was one of the most intelligent men, who
ever lived, and, he was executed, by a huge population, of retarded
prostitutes-who, could not spell their own names. Unfortunately-no birth
control existed, in the time of Socrates, and today, there is birth control,
and no one wants to use it. To be great, to rule successfully, to leave an unforgettable
legacy-of meaning, and contributions-more than: artists, “anyone/anything
ideology,” and, a-majority-of retarded people-is required.
A
theory of intelligence, based on: “deception,” is not helpful to anyone:
• What is
intelligence theory? And;
• Is there a
uniquely American theory of intelligence? And;
• Which
assumptions about intelligence and intelligence reform are useful, and which
should be overturned? And;
• Can results from
intelligence be measured? (Boraz et al. 2006, 1)
Not a single question, can be considered,
or asked-when all of the answers are lies!
Reference
Boraz, Steven, Jones, Seth, Treveron,
Gregory F., Phillip Lipscy.
2006. “Toward a
Theory of Intelligence Workshop Report.” RAND National Security Research.
Accessed February 19, 2017.
GAO. 2015. “UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS: Actions
Needed
to Improve DOD
Pilot Training.” United States
Government Accountability Office, Report to Congressional Committees. Accessed
February 19, 2017.
No comments:
Post a Comment