1-19-2017
American Public University System
2nd Master’s Degree:
Intelligence Officer In Training
Intelligence and Global Studies
Miss. Bayo Elizabeth Cary, AA, BA, MLIS
Cell: 1-352-872-4774
Email: mumbaibayo.cary@yandex.com
Intl
500 Homework Focus Group Question Week 3:
When it comes to academic writing what are some of the
key challenges that this style of writing presents? How is
professional/academic writing different from writing in the work place or
technical writing?
Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 300 words. Please respond to at least 2 other students. Responses should be a minimum of 250 words and include direct questions.
Initial Post Due: Thursday, by 11:55pm ET
Responses Due: Sunday, by 11:55pm ET
Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 300 words. Please respond to at least 2 other students. Responses should be a minimum of 250 words and include direct questions.
Initial Post Due: Thursday, by 11:55pm ET
Responses Due: Sunday, by 11:55pm ET
Body
of Research Paper and Response:
I think, that some of the greatest
challenges in professional writing, both: academic and otherwise, originate
with the male gender. Too often, men-are soo sexist in their views against
women participating, in politics-or in anything else, that our pieces of
professional writing, are intentionally excluded, from: professional media and journals,
and from research papers with passing grades. As women-we have been judged
negatively, as: lesbians, and: “feminists.”
In the new age, of: “open-mindedness,” when men
are encouraged to marry other men-I think it hypocritical, for gay men to say-gay
male opinion-in professional research and writing, is, of the highest importance,
while, at the same time-lesbian opinion, in: “feminist writings,” is of no consequence.
It seems odd to me, that although publicized, as: LBGT, that-the “L,” for
lesbian, should be both: “isolated, and excluded,” while -at the very same
time, the other “gay,” male based newly sexually freed class of the human
race-should be, both: celebrated, and revered.
I
recall, that, I first encountered this issue, of prejudices, in academia,
against a woman-as the: “feminist writer,” as an undergraduate student, at: The
University of Florida. It was at that time, while studying at U.F., that I
choose to explore some traditional and classic, lesbian literature: Moths,
by Ouida (1880), and Room of One’s Own, by Virginia Woolf (1929). In
addition, to locking women, out of the professional writer’s academic world,
women have historically, also been locked out of access, to information in general-by
being refused us entrance, to, both: universities, and, to their libraries:
That a famous library has been cursed by a woman is a matter of complete
indifference to a famous library. Venerable and calm, with all its treasures
safe locked within its breast, it sleeps complacently and will, so far as I am
concerned, so sleep for ever (sic.). Never will I wake those echoes, never will
I ask for that hospitality again, I vowed as I descended the steps in anger.
(Woolf 1929, “Chapter 1”)
It would be a travesty, for one to discuss, the importance, of writing in a
professional manner, and, regarding valuable contributions, to professional
writings-without, first addressing the still persistent contemporary gender
divide-which, too often, excludes a woman, from both: academia, and, the world
of professional writing.
. . ., I argue that
feminist security studies offers an important corrective to the foundational
assumptions of IR, which themselves can perpetuate the very instances of
violence that they seek to redress. If we accept the core insights of feminist
security studies – the centrality of the human subject; the importance of
particular configurations of masculinity and femininity; and the gendered
conceptual framework that underpins the discipline of IR – we are encouraged to
envisage a rather different politics of the global. (Shepard 2009, 208)
In-so-far, as the
academic field of professional writing, relates to: intelligence studies, it has
been shown-that, excluding women, from the process-has, in fact, had a
detrimental impact, on contemporary global politics (Shepard 2009, 208). As a
women, and, as having a physical chemistry, that differs from a man, my
concerns, regarding a: “warring situation,” focus on-the safety, of my children
and family. I worry more-as a woman, about whether my children are healthy, and
if they will survive-than I ever will, about bombing my neighbor next door. I
care about my children, more than I care about killing other people-in every
instance.
When men go to war, they arrive at
battle, concerned most, about who the winners, and who the losers will be. Men,
can be so “single-minded” in their focus-where: “war,” is concerned-that, they
vow to “win at all costs,” and to “take no hostages,” and “to be the last man
standing!” It is not helpful, that women are excluded, from the cadre, of
professional writers, in the academic field of intelligence-who, should theoretically,
offer some: reason and logic, to the “warring situation.” As a woman, I have a
mind, as well, and, as a human being, my thoughts and concerns-are also valid.
The academic field of intelligence, relates
to the “theater of war,” in important, and note worth ways-with far-reaching,
and pending implications, of the tertiary sort. Writing, for the sake of
communications, is a process that we Americans, learn in elementary school. The
written communications, of daily importance, when written in a casual
environment-tend to be: in a colloquial tone, with relaxed semantics and
syntax, and, regarding informal subject matter-that has not been supported with:
research writings, and the required-properly cited references, and resources.
Professional writings, differ, in a great many ways, from what is written and
shared, on a regular and everyday basis, by say: text message, or, in online
social networking conversation.
Professional
writing, is a “specialized” form, of advanced writing skills, and, it takes
many years, of practiced study and research, to learn to do it very well. The
US military, as explained in the journal article: “Professional Writing: A Lost
Necessity,” regarding improving the writing skills, of active duty US Marines-explains,
that-becoming a member, of the US military, has its strengths, and now-it also
has English writing homework, at a university level (Cordera 2014, 76). US
military, as the active duty soldiers of America-must contribute, to their own
welfare, by learning how to write professionally, and, in such a way-impact “precarious”
International political decisions and situations-WAR (Cordera 2014, 74).
References
Amazon.com. 1996-2017. “Moths Novel by Ouida
1880.”
Amazon.com Online Book Search, January 2017.
Accessed January 19, 2017. https://www.amazon.com/Moths-Broadview-Editions-Ouida/dp/1551115204/ref=sr_1_12?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1484855312&sr=1-12&keywords=ouida
Amazon.com. 1996-2017. “Room of One’s Own
by
Virginia Woolf
1929.” Amazon Online Book Search,
January 2017. Accessed January 19, 2017. https://www.amazon.com/Room-Ones-Own-Virginia-Woolf/dp/0156787334/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1484856775&sr=1-1&keywords=Room+of+One%27s+Own
Cordera, Allan T. 2014. “Professional
Writing: A
Lost Necessity.” Marine Corps Gazette, vol. 98. 11: 74-76.
Accessed January 19, 2017. file:///C:/Users/Mumbai%20Eliza/Documents/APUS%20Intl%20500%20Week%203%20Focus%20Assignment%20Professional%20Writing%20Commentary%20by%20US%20Marines.pdf
Shepherd, Laura J. 2009. “Gender, Violence
and
Global Politics: Contemporary Debates in Feminist Security
Studies.” Political Studies Review, vol. 7.: 208-219. Accessed January 19,
2017. file:///C:/Users/Mumbai%20Eliza/Documents/APUS%20Research%20Global%20Studies%20And%20Gender%20Studies%20Intl%20Security%20Issues.pdf
Woolf, Virginia. 1929. “A Room Of One’s
Own
Chapter 1.” Adelaide Online E Books, N.D. Accessed
January 19, 2017. https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/w/woolf/virginia/w91r/chapter1.html
No comments:
Post a Comment